[Water] I feel like Copilot's GPT is probably fine-tuned by Microsoft specifically for agents

RT, I get the feeling that Microsoft Copilot’s GPT 5.6 Reasoning may be a model specifically designed and fine-tuned for agents.
Because its CoT (chain of thought) is almost entirely structured thinking, something like this:
​Title (determine the intent category)
​Body (clarify the next action)
It’s like writing an operation log for your own next action—a steady stream of steps—rather than the rambling thoughts of typical models.
Let’s compare
Traditional extended reasoning: “I need to check the connection pool now. Let me think—the Take and Warm behaviors in the connection pool might affect TTFB, so I’ll first use the shell to check the logs. Also, PreheatPool needs attention…” (verbose and difficult to parse)
​Agent-structured reasoning:
​Title (determine the intent category)
​Body (clarify the next action)

**Deciding next action**
It seems like the task requires inspecting the connection pool and its warm-up criteria. I'll proceed with executing the shell tool to inspect the connection pool logs.

The benefits are faster responses, strong parsability, and lower token usage, which works very well in agent environments.

The downside is sacrificing depth of thought, which may make the model appear less intelligent. For the model, the tolerance for errors is low (because it cannot repeatedly correct itself, think things through, or change direction). It may perform poorly on mathematics and deep-reasoning tasks.

The above is entirely my own speculation. It does not represent the model’s actual training objectives, nor does it mean that the model’s chain of thought (CoT) is completely like this. It is also possible that this is an overview produced by further processing of the model’s output.

Comparison of the reasoning/output recorded by the client

4 Likes

If it works, that’s good enough—what more could you ask for? :xhj09:

2 Likes

You really shouldn’t expect too much from something that’s free.

Indeed, the thinking time is like having low mode turned on.

But make sure to position it clearly.

It could probably replace ChatGPT 5.5, and there are also some domestic models.

Otherwise, if this guy messes with your mindset and you lose it, it’ll be rough.

Just treat it as ChatGPT 5.6 Flash Lite :ac01:

Not that long…:xhj21:

It’s a bit like the GPT offered by Perplexity: even with deep thinking enabled, it basically starts outputting after thinking for just five or six seconds. Very fast.

1 Like

Indeed, mjj has thought it through thoroughly. I generally don’t have a clear position on free.

But is this speed good or bad? :xhj001:

It’s good at handling tasks, but the task planning isn’t great. The answers are simple, even for medium-level questions they’re very fast, and the experience feels smooth.

Then we’ll just have to add another normal ‘think’ as the planning model.

Sometimes it just can’t recognize local files. There are also issues with session switching, like forgetting the context or mixing up sessions. But overall, I’m pretty tolerant when it comes to free tokens.

I used it once and then ditched it :new_moon_face:

It’s more like LoRA was added, not full fine-tuning. If it really was full fine-tuning, it would only show that Microsoft’s data is pretty weak.

I don’t know if I can fix it.

There are only a day or two left.

School is starting soon :xhj17:

Are you a college student?
:xhj37:

No

That’s some sharp observation.

It’s not free, though, is it? Don’t you need a Microsoft 365 subscription?

Having an E3/E5 is enough.