ColoCrossing 2026 VPS Promotion Summary Stay Away from Stone Disk CCS Reliable

In the VPS (Virtual Private Server) industry, those in the know go with CCS, which stands for ColoCrossing. They’re a major upstream provider for RN, their machines are reliable, stable, and won’t drop connections, but most importantly, they’re cheap.

Winter Promotion

RAM Cores SSD Bandwidth Price Link
1G 1 core 30G 40T/month $10.99/year Link
2G 2 cores 40G 40T/month $15.99/year Link
4G 3 cores 60G 40T/month $20.99/year Link
8G 4 cores 80G 40T/month $39.99/year Link
12G 6 cores 100G 40T/month $59.99/year Link

Black Friday Specials

Cores RAM Disk Bandwidth Price Link
1 core 1GB 20GB 20TB/1Gbps $11.99/year Link
2 cores 2GB 40GB 20TB/1Gbps $18.99/year Link
3 cores 4GB 40GB 20TB/1Gbps $4.99/month Link
4 cores 8GB 80GB 20TB/1Gbps $9.99/month Link
6 cores 12GB 100GB 20TB/1Gbps $12.99/month Link
8 cores 16GB 120GB 20TB/1Gbps $15.99/month Link

Double 11 (Singles’ Day) Specials

Cores RAM Disk Bandwidth Price Link
1 core 1GB 30GB 40TB/1Gbps $11.11/year Link
2 cores 2GB 40GB 40TB/1Gbps $16.16/year Link
3 cores 4GB 60GB 50TB/1Gbps $22.22/year Link
4 cores 8GB 80GB 40TB/1Gbps $44.44/year Link
6 cores 12GB 100GB 40TB/1Gbps $66.66/month Link
2 Likes

Is there Du Fu?

There is also, this post only shares VPS


Bought one of their Specials - 2GB RAM Black Friday - CVPS Custom during Black Friday

2 Likes

ccs randomly bans accounts based on loyalty and does not refund them, occasionally secretly throttling speeds to 100Mbps. Ticket response time is long, while nearby providers have been thoroughly criticized.

mjj avoids three types: cc (already downed), ccs (VPS), lxc

2 Likes

:ac01:

Review is here:

-------------------------------------VPS Fusion Monster Test-------------------------------------
Version: v0.1.123
Review Channel: https://t.me/+UHVoo2U4VyA5NTQ1
Go Project Address: https://github.com/oneclickvirt/ecs
Shell Project Address: https://github.com/spiritLHLS/ecs
--------------------------------------Basic System Information--------------------------------------
CPU Model            : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2683 v4 @ 2.10GHz
CPU Count            : 4 Virtual CPU(s)
CPU Cache            : L1: 128 KB / L2: 512 KB / L3: 40 MB
GPU Model            : GD 5446
AES-NI               : ✔️ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V/Hyper-V   : ✔️ Enabled
Memory               : 4.82 GB / 7.75 GB
Balloon Driver       : ✔️ Enabled
Kernel Same-page Merging: ❌ Undetected
Virtual Memory Swap  : 0.00 MB / 1024.00 MB
Disk Space           : 30.51 GB / 78.63 GB [38.8%%] /dev/vda1 - /
Boot Disk Path       : /dev/vda1
OS                   : debian 12.9 [x86_64]
Kernel               : 6.1.0-31-amd64
Uptime               : 0 days, 08 hours, 17 minutes
Timezone             : EDT
Load                 : 0.39 / 0.28 / 0.20
Virtualization       : KVM
NAT Type             : Port Restricted Cone
TCP Acceleration     : cubic
IPV4 ASN             : AS36352 HostPapa
IPV4 Location        : Los Angeles / California / United States
--------------------------------CPU Test - Via sysbench--------------------------------
1 Thread Test (Single-Core) Score: 616.57
4 Thread Test (Multi-Core) Score: 2173.41
---------------------------------Memory Test - Via stream----------------------------------
Function    Best Rate MB/s  Avg time     Min time     Max time
Copy:           11733.8     0.015284     0.013636     0.016290
Scale:           6603.1     0.026583     0.024231     0.028561
Add:             7368.3     0.034867     0.032572     0.036943
Triad:           7154.6     0.036061     0.033545     0.039055
-----------------------------------Disk Test - Via fio-----------------------------------
Test Path     Block Size    Read Test (IOPS)         Write Test (IOPS)        Total (IOPS)
/root             4k        44.14 MB/s(11.0k)       44.21 MB/s(11.1k)       88.35 MB/s(22.1k)
/root             64k       176.84 MB/s(2763)       177.77 MB/s(2777)       354.61 MB/s(5540)
/root             512k      325.56 MB/s(635)        342.86 MB/s(669)        668.41 MB/s(1304)
/root             1m        210.91 MB/s(205)        224.95 MB/s(219)        435.86 MB/s(424)
--------------------------------------Cross-Border Platform Unlock--------------------------------------
IPV4:
============[ Cross-Border Platforms ]============
Apple                     YES (Region: USA)
BingSearch                YES (Region: US)
Claude                    YES (Region: US)
Dazn                      Banned
Disney+                   NO (forbidden-location)
Gemini                    NO
GoogleSearch              YES
Google Play Store         NO (Region: CN)
IQiYi                     YES (Region: US)
Instagram Licensed Audio  YES
KOCOWA                    YES
MetaAI                    YES
Netflix                   NO
Netflix CDN               NO (Main Service Unavailable) (Region: US)
OneTrust                  YES (Region: US CALIFORNIA)
ChatGPT                   YES (Region: US)
Paramount+                YES
Amazon Prime Video        YES (Region: US)
Reddit                    NO
SonyLiv                   Banned
Sora                      YES (Region: US)
Spotify Registration      NO
Steam Store               YES (Community Available) (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+              YES (Region: US)
TikTok                    YES (Region: US)
Viu.com                   YES
Wikipedia Editability     NO
YouTube Region            NO
YouTube CDN               NO (YouTube Video Server Main Service Unavailable) (Region: LAX)
--------------------------------------IP Quality Check--------------------------------------
Below are database IDs; after each result, the corresponding database source ID is shown
ipinfo DB [0] | scamalytics DB [1] | virustotal DB [2] | abuseipdb DB [3] | ip2location DB [4]
ip-api DB [5] | ipwhois DB [6] | ipregistry DB [7] | ipdata DB [8] | db-ip DB [9]
ipapiis DB [A] | ipapicom DB [B] | bigdatacloud DB [C] | dkly DB [D] | ipqualityscore DB [E]
ipintel DB [F] | ipfighter DB [G] | fraudlogix DB [H] | cloudflare DB [I] |
IPV4:
Security Score:
Trust Score (Higher is better): 33 [8]
VPN Score (Lower is better): 100 [8]
Proxy Score (Lower is better): 0 [8]
Community Votes - Harmless: 0 [2]
Community Votes - Malicious: 0 [2]
Threat Score (Lower is better): 100 [8]
Fraud Score (Lower is better): 100 [E]
Abuse Score (Lower is better): 0 [3]
ASN Abuse Score (Lower is better): 0.0354 (High) [A]
Company Abuse Score (Lower is better): 0.029 (Elevated) [A]
Threat Level: low [9 B]
Traffic Share: Human (Higher is better) 15% [I] Bot (Lower is better) 84% [I]
Blacklist Record Stats: (Number of blacklist sites with a record):
Harmless Records: 0 [2]  Malicious Records: 0 [2] Suspicious Records: 0 [2]  No Records: 94 [2]
Security Info:
Usage Type: hosting [0 3 7 8 A C] business [9]
Company Type: hosting [0 7 A]
Browser Type: Mainstream 87%  Other 12% [I]
Device Type: Desktop 80%  Mobile 19%  Other 0% [I]
OS Type: Mainstream 93%  Other 6% [I]
Cloud Provider: Yes [7 D]
Data Center: Yes [0 5 8 A C]
Mobile Device: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
Proxy: Yes [E] No [0 4 5 7 8 9 A B C D]
VPN: Yes [E] No [0 7 A C D]
Tor Exit Node: No [7 D]
Tor Out: No [7 D]
Web Crawler: No [9 A B E]
Anonymous: Yes [8] No [7 D]
Attacker: No [7 8 D]
Abuser: No [7 8 A C D] Yes [E]
Threat: No [7 8 C D]
Relay: No [0 7 8 C D]
Bogon: No [7 8 A C D]
Bot: Yes [E]
DNS Blacklist: 304(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 15(Blacklisted) 19(Other)
--------------------------------------Mail Port Scan--------------------------------------
Platform  SMTP  SMTPS POP3  POP3S IMAP  IMAPS
LocalPort ✔     ✘     ✔     ✔     ✔     ✔
QQ        ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
163       ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Sohu      ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Yandex    ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Gmail     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
Outlook   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Office365 ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Yahoo     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
MailCOM   ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
MailRU    ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
AOL       ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
GMX       ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Sina      ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Apple     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
FastMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
ProtonMail✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
MXRoute   ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
Namecrane ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
XYAMail   ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
ZohoMail  ✘     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘     ✘
Inbox_eu  ✔     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✘     ✘
Free_fr   ✘     ✔     ✔     ✘     ✔     ✘
------------------------------------Upstream & Return Route Detection-------------------------------------
Beijing Telecom v4 219.141.140.10      Telecom163    [Standard Line]
Beijing Unicom v4 202.106.195.68      Unicom4837     [Standard Line]
Beijing Mobile v4 221.179.155.161     MobileCMI      [Standard Line]
Shanghai Telecom v4 202.96.209.133    Telecom163     [Standard Line]
Shanghai Unicom v4 210.22.97.1        Unable to detect return routing node’s IPV4 address
Shanghai Mobile v4 211.136.112.200    MobileCMI      [Standard Line]
Guangzhou Telecom v4 58.60.188.222    Telecom163     [Standard Line]
Guangzhou Unicom v4 210.21.196.6      Unicom4837     [Standard Line]
Guangzhou Mobile v4 120.196.165.24    MobileCMI      [Standard Line]
Chengdu Telecom v4 61.139.2.69        Telecom163     [Standard Line]
Chengdu Unicom v4 119.6.6.6           Unable to detect return routing node’s IPV4 address
Chengdu Mobile v4 211.137.96.205      MobileCMIN2    [Premium Line]
For exact routes, refer to detailed traceroute info. Results are for reference only.
When multiple connections target the same destination, detection may have passed the aggregation layer; only the first line is valid, others might be invalid.
-------------------------------------China Triple-Network Return Route Detection-------------------------------------
Guangzhou Telecom - ICMP v4 - traceroute to 58.60.188.222, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1.12 ms      AS36352    *                  USA, California, Los Angeles, colocrossing.com
23.98 ms     *          *                  *
0.62 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
0.91 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
1.75 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
103.92 ms    AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
162.77 ms    AS4134     [CHINANET-BB]      China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinatelecom.com.cn  [Telecom]
165.97 ms    AS4134     [CHINANET-BB]      China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinatelecom.com.cn
170.73 ms    AS4134     [CHINANET-BB]      China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinatelecom.com.cn
*
Guangzhou Unicom - ICMP v4 - traceroute to 210.21.196.6, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1.23 ms      AS36352    *                  USA, California, Los Angeles, colocrossing.com
0.43 ms      *          *                  *
0.61 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
0.97 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
1.00 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
91.04 ms     AS1299     *                  USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
292.55 ms    AS4837     [CU169-BACKBONE]   China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinaunicom.cn
*
244.14 ms    AS17623    [APNIC-AP]         China, Guangdong, Shenzhen, chinaunicom.cn  [Unicom]
218.49 ms    AS17623    *                  China, Guangdong, Shenzhen, chinaunicom.cn  [Unicom]
Guangzhou Mobile - ICMP v4 - traceroute to 120.196.165.24, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1.11 ms      AS36352    *                  USA, California, Los Angeles, colocrossing.com
0.34 ms      *          *                  *
0.70 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
1.05 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
2.12 ms      AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
11.20 ms     AS1299     [ARELION-NET]      USA, California, Los Angeles, arelion.com
11.78 ms     AS58453    [CMI-INT]          USA, California, Los Angeles, cmi.chinamobile.com  [Mobile]
169.90 ms    AS58453    [CMI-INT]          China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, cmi.chinamobile.com  [Mobile]
170.88 ms    AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  [Mobile]
169.89 ms    AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  [Mobile]
173.49 ms    AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  [Mobile]
173.39 ms    AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  [Mobile]
177.12 ms    AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  [Mobile]
173.52 ms    AS56040    [APNIC-AP]         China, Guangdong, Shenzhen, gd.10086.cn  [Mobile]
-------------------------------------PING Value Test--------------------------------------
TG-DC1 MIA USA        62 | TG-DC3 MIA USA        63 | TG-DC4 AMS NL        148 |
TG-DC2 AMS NL        148 | TG-DC5 Singapore     181 |
Reddit                 4 | Claude                 7 | MetaAI                 7 |
CNN                    7 | StackOverflow         11 | Sora                  12 |
Twitch                16 | OpenAI                18 | Azure                 19 |
Apple                 27 | BBC                   29 | DigitalOcean          35 |
Wikipedia             38 | DisneyPlus            65 | Bing                  67 |
ViuTV                 79 | Gemini                80 | AWS                   89 |
Amazon                91 | NYTimes               93 | Instagram             96 |
Google               108 | GitHub               112 | Docker Hub           128 |
eBay                 141 | Microsoft            146 | YouTube              149 |
Twitter/X            161 | GitLab               168 | Facebook             179 |
Bilibili             210 | Steam                219 | Spotify              221 |
AliExpress           232 | PrimeVideo           251 | Google Cloud         259 |
iQIYI                276 | TikTok               412 | Netflix              428 |
TVB Anywhere         613 |
--------------------------------------Speed Test to Nearby Nodes--------------------------------------
Location         Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency        Packet Loss
Speedtest.net    684.44 Mbps      785.39 Mbps         861.311µs      0.00% (Sent: 402/Dup: 0/Max: 401)
Tokyo, Japan      58.44 Mbps       26.26 Mbps         118.700417ms   N/A
Frankfurt         376.61 Mbps     116.50 Mbps         145.077435ms   N/A
Unicom Tianjin     9.65 Mbps       23.00 Mbps         278.43 ms      N/A
Unicom Shanghai    9.77 Mbps      347.84 Mbps         278.99 ms      N/A
Telecom Shanghai   3.83 Mbps      291.64 Mbps         194.57 ms      N/A
Telecom Quanzhou  11.32 Mbps       97.33 Mbps         249.93 ms      N/A
Mobile Foshan     18.84 Mbps       59.65 Mbps         243.07 ms      N/A
Mobile Shanghai   11.57 Mbps       66.23 Mbps         254.96 ms      N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost         : 8 min 27 sec
Time         : Sun Apr 26 10:26:27 EDT 2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------